17 de enero de 2021

José Antonio Acevedo Díaz

The slides that follow are very simplified schemes and, therefore, limited to the most general features. Within each paradigm, positions of the several authors differ to a greater or lesser extent. For example, we have cataloged Kuhn, Feyerabend and Glasersfeld as relativistic, knowing that his relativism is not exactly the same. Another example is the realistic positions; those of Popper, Tuomela and Niiniluoto can be regarded typical of the strong realism, but there are other positions realistic, as the transformative realism (Hacking) and the constructive realism (Giere).

Descargar

Más de José Antonio Acevedo-Díaz en Formación Ib

Facebook de Controversias en la historia de la ciencia y la cultura cientifica

Como citar

Acevedo-Díaz, José. (2015). Four epistemological paradigms on Nature of Science - Presentation. 10.13140/RG.2.1.1507.5360.

II Congreso Iberoamericano de Docentes. Docentes frente a la pandemia